The moonbats grip on most of the mainstream media outlets in the west has reached the Economist. I'm not the first person to notice this, in fact its been a bit of a theme in blogland for the last couple of months, but its still shocking when you come face to face with it.
"In the past fortnight, over 200 homemade rockets have been fired, killing one Israeli, while retaliatory Israeli air strikes have killed some 50 Palestinians, including civilians."
The Economist, May 26th 2007 edition.
When is a civilian not a civilian? When they are in Israel, stoopid. ALL the Qassams are aimed at large civilian targets, and ALL the Israeli air strikes are aimed at Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorist targets, but lets go with the moonbat moral equivalency crap anyhow. I guess it just goes to show that Goebbels was right- repeat the lie long enough and it becomes the truth. Keep on pumping out the garbage about 'resistance' and 'holocaust' and 'massacres' and 'Jewish Nazi's' and eventually the western press will start to parrot your words. Do you suppose the current crop of journo's working at the Economist have ever considered this question- if the Palestinians had the weapons that the Israeli's have, what would they do to the Israeli's? Every honest person knows the answer to that question. It wouldn't be '50 Israelis, including civilians'. Tel Aviv, Netanya, Beersheba and Ashdod would very shortly cease to exist. How might that be reported by all the Pali-apologists? 'After 10 days of continuous bombardment, 300,000 Israeli's have died in Eilat. It is not known if any were civilians, but who really cares.'
No comments:
Post a Comment